In short this is unlikely to be the end of the ongoing Manston saga simply because TDC cannot say NO MORE.
Last night 29th October 2015 the UKIP Cabinet voted 5-1 to reject Riveroak's bid to become an indemnity party. What they didn't vote for was an end to the CPO of Manston Airport.
Today the war of words continue. Konnor Collins ( a Ukipper who defected ) threw down the gauntlet to Chris Wells.
Not sure this is very bright however its his future. Councillors should behave with a lot more decorum IMO.
The Thanet Gazette reports the following today
THE spokesman for the Manston airport site owners, Ray Mallon, says
Sir Roger Gale is to blame for Thanet council's failed attempts to
compulsorily purchase the airfield.
Mr Mallon launched an attack
on the veteran North Thanet MP after the council last night rejected US
hedge fund RiverOak for the second time as a partner with which to
reopen the airport.
Conservative Sir Roger has long championed the
American firm as a suitable financial backer to fund a Compusory
Purchase Order (CPO) of the site for the local authority.
Mr
Mallon said: "There are three elements to the CPO process. First of all,
the council needed a financial partner, secondly they have got to
advance the process and thirdly they have got to win it.
Well will the Vote succeed currently the numbers are as follows
UKIP 27 (however Vince Munday will be resigning and another election will be held)
Tories 19
Diggers 5
Labour 4
Independant 1
Assuming both labour and Indie abstain then it will be 26 to 24.
Time will tell as to how together the UKIP party is but really does Bob want the poisoned chalice that is Manston?
This coalition of goodwill is a ridiculous idea. Bayford may say that he (and his cabinet) would have signed the deal with RiverOak, but he knows that they wouldn't have gone through with it against legal advice. He also knows that Labour wouldn't sign a deal with RiverOak in a month of Sundays. The Labour Group took a lot of flak for turning RiverOak down last December and it probably damaged their election result. No doubt they feel utterly vindicated by what's happened since the election. Why on earth would they get involved in doing a deal which, essentially, admitted that they were wrong all along. In any event there are several prominent councillors from both Labour and the Conservatives who, after learning of his history, would not sign a deal if Tony Freudmann was involved. Bayford knows all of this. He's just throwing it out here so that he can claim he tried to save the deal. It's politics, nothing more.
ReplyDelete