Friday, 11 December 2015

Strange People

Manston Pickle a hard hitting opponent of the Pro Manston supporters has always kept the admins secret because of the vitriol and bullying that would come their way should they be unmasked.

Yesterdays post was particularly hard hitting and too the point.


 And then people commented

So how do the worthies in Manston Loud Hailer deal with the comments. Do they:
1. Comment themselves
2. Provide facts that disprove the arguments put forward
3. Rant & rave blaming everyone except themselves

 So Mr. (I use that word advisedly) Hudson let me make things clear I am not an admin on Manston Pickle nor have I ever been. So crawl back into your darkened room and go back to your keyboard warrioring.
You are free to comment on here just add your name to the post I dare you. The same goes for John Davis who posted these choice words.



Another coward who spreads rumour and bile from the safety of his computer and this man is Chairman of local constituted group with a "code of conduct". It's obvious he think this doesn't apply to himself
Now lets see how brave you are. I'm lifting my head above the parapet let's see if you are able!!

54 comments:

  1. Hi Barry,not very nice people having a go at you.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Manston Pickle is a hard hitting TRUTH telling Opponent,the truth hurts!Prosecuted by whom,Margate police? They did not have the 'Resources Available'for a reported crime from FoRS they never had the TIME to help Paul who walked into the police station and made a statement on how he was offered money to walkaway from the Manston airpirt deal,then blackmailed to Walkaway,and in fear of his life.Does someone have to be dripping in blood to get any help from Margate police or what? Humpty Dumpty legally has the Law on his side!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Who said it was Margate station?

      Delete
    2. Lazy cops by the sounds of it. How are they reviewed...oh no Ann Barnes rubberstamp

      Delete
    3. Yes the police seem to be deciding on their own policies of what they will and won't do for their tax money

      Delete
  3. That was quick,was it not Margate police,HD

    ReplyDelete
  4. What police station was it if it was'nt Margate? 22:28.

    ReplyDelete
  5. So that's what the DAVIS report looks like,HaHaHaHaHa,talk about eating your own words,HaHaHaHaHaHa! John u want to look a bit closer to home on nicked paperwork.John as "advised by Kent police"You Sure? Go and ask with other people and film it! You and your mates and the police who Advided this should all be kicked,Bronson Charles rings a Bell on that one.Oh and despised by who Johny Davis?
    please let Mr Davis know i'm talking about him here, Anon 20:28 Regards Humpty.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Do you lot think there is only one police station in Thanet?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hi Barry, after reading the second screen print from John Davis I had to laugh. Never let the truth get in the way of a good story lol. I'm actually a member of the FORS fb group and that so called video was posted late at night by a James Clark aka Daniel Light. I suspect Kandy Jones got him to do her dirty work as she was the one filming on your doorstep along with a 'Pickle' Ms M and a witness. This was explained on the post on fb after a few people left in disgust. The post was then removed but rumour has it that a few Kandy followers have it in their possession. I have asked a mate of my mine who is with the police and according to him they would not have asked them to film you on your doorstep. Another blatant lie from Mr Davis. I have seen the video and most of it features your wife who I believed had nothing to do with FORS but was having a right go at them. All I can say is this will put people off joining local groups with this kind of behaviour. Can you please explain about these so called 'Documents' that you have in your possession?



    ReplyDelete
  8. Well done Barry and the Steve Hudson and John Davis characters seem unpleasant. Who are these loudmouths?

    Alan Poole has Humptys egg on face as he forgets the Davies Commission long ago ruled out Manston. ..leaving our local numpties to support it.

    Surely Gale and Mackinlay and Bayford and Wells need to resign having failed on their election pledges or are they hoping to drift along being paid?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Don't think Poole has much to celebrate seeing as he lost £3.4M on Transeuropa and £3.4M on closing the port illegally. Very poor decisions

      Delete
    2. Gale is'nt going no where he wants SHP/Manston for his MATE!,pardon the pun,Gales in it for the long haul.At least Mr Wells is by duty of care keeping the wolfs a bay!He's in a corner!

      Delete
    3. Surly Gale,Mackinlay,Bayford,and others should be taking Handcuffed to police stations and quizzed,ASAP.

      Delete
    4. And always hilarious when Everitt tries to excuse it. Poole was involved in pleasurama too?

      Delete
    5. Kent police daredn't investigate the corruption.

      Delete
  9. Why doesn't Wells or Bayford say who the 4 new manston investors are? Sounds like porkies as a distraction

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. TOP SECRET EYES ONLY,stuff. Unless your in with SuMA.If you was to khow who the 4ish investors were you and others would see though them,like RiverOak were seen through.More like a distraction of Porkies.

      Delete
    2. If Wells is porkying about 4 new investors he needs to resign We're not funding council officials to come out with BS

      Delete
  10. Who is James Clark/Daniel Light and Kandy Jones? A bucket of water would get them off your doorstep.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Tarring and feathering would be better. They should resign looking at that code of conduct, they have bought FORS into disrepute

      Delete
    2. Who are they?

      Delete
    3. It seems like stuopidity. Phone police to attend a civil dispute to prevent a breach of peace. Check no officers are available. Breach the peace blamke the other party. Basic Thanet.

      Delete
  11. Sounds like a vote of no confidence in the unpleasant John Davis. He and his group don't represent me and what have they done?

    ReplyDelete
  12. The market testing is reopening? But Wells said 4 investors already?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. River Oak was the best of the best last time remember! So now TDC are going backwards to go forwards,HaHaHaHaHa River no Oak trees get another go? Lets see who turns up next,I think this time RiverOak will have become a butterfly.

      Delete
  13. Humpty Dumpty can see who is coming,and it will not be wonderful like the SuMA/SMA ect etc think.Truthwillout ect etc will have a shock as well.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Dreamland creditors report available at Green Targett website - opening described as chaos and Tdc being sued

    ReplyDelete
  15. I wonder who's next on the list to sue Tdc? can you think of a company that feel/think Tdc did them wrong?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Who is 1st on the list as Riveroak are strangely silent on their threats to sue TDC

      Delete
    2. Riveroak have not finished their takeover plan YET,when all else fails thay will start their plan B and sue.

      Delete
    3. What grounds do they have to sue? They basically took a punt and it failed. They haven't even lost any money.

      Delete
    4. Hi Anon 09:03 How About Riveroak spent over a Million Pounds?What would it mean if TDC had INFO and no intention to CPO with Riveroak but played along?

      Delete
  16. Come to Kent and sue TDC,open season wellcomes anyone from anywhere in the world!CPO anyone.

    ReplyDelete
  17. The bottom line is TDC could not get an environmental and health impact study past a judge. Chris Wells now has even UKIP cllrs supporting my wee petition re water supply

    Roger Gale has elected silence on issues around Sericol 30 year contamination of water supply.

    And Manston Owners know if you wondering why you can hear laughter

    ReplyDelete
  18. Did you know there were three environmetal officers working at Manston airport for many years is that the norm? Or is that a secrect? Humpty Dumpty would like to know,Did you know that Richard Card? Regards HD

    ReplyDelete
  19. Seems Barry may be getting wary of publishing answers. What was the tunneled pipeline from Haine area to manston tank storage (?) for put in about 1974 ? Were they EA or TDC or MOD environment officers ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Richard you have been on blogs long enough to understand libel laws

      Delete
    2. Hello Richard IS the pipeline from Haine (petrol garage)to Manston tank storage the one for the heated runway thing! or another one?YES there were 3 Environmental officers at Manston Airport,How do I know? I know because David Smith CBE KCC told Me.WHY THREE?

      Delete
  20. Barry Do you write all the anonymous responses yourself? what is the readership of this blog 3 ? including your dog??

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Humpty Dumpty is not Anonymous he told Freudmanns mate Alan Marsh VP of Annex Aviation in front of Rob Smith BBC to sue Me! Because I said to Marsh ¨Freudmann and Gale are crooks and that gos for you to Alan Marsh¨Marsh went into one and stormed off,all in front of Rob Smith BBC and others the day the offer was rejected by Mrs Gloag at Manston airport.Not Gale,Freudmann,Marsh ect etc have lifted a finger to sue Me, Coz I HOLD the Truth on their lies.And when it comes to reading Barry James blogs any one can see there are lots of people looking and learning more everyday about the SHP-Manston Ripoff!

      Delete
    2. Humpty says the readership are everybody who are intrested in the SHP-Manston debate Manston say thay have 9000 THERES A START

      Delete
  21. I would like to point out there has never ever been an attempt to take libel action against me. Whereas Thanet two leading bloggers have had a warning and a police caution interview respectively.

    In so far unpublished comments I have pointed out that there are two judicial directions to obey. One is not to identify a man whose name emerged in civil high court 1998 Mortlock v Maison libel trial. The other is an embargo on inquest transcript David O Leary Decd murder victim 2008.

    A lot of Thanet bloggers use the word "Libel" without understanding what it is.

    One of the complexities being if a person accuses another of libelling a third it sort of proves it isn;t libel. Oxymoron accusation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Richard it isn't about who might sue you. You know full well the 1st place lawyers come to is the admin for allowing posts. As Michael told you its best to err on the side of caution as the blog owner takes the rap 1st

      Delete
    2. Baz surely it is about who might sue you? Lawyers can only ask posts to be removed if libel is proven by a court. Otherwise there's no free speech is there...?

      Richard asking who is the EA staff is hardly libel.

      Delete
    3. Who are the two Thanet leading Bloggers please.

      Delete
    4. Anon 16:38 You would need to ask David Smith CBE of KCC,He knows.

      Delete
  22. Gazette and TDc itself say Wells is telling porkies over 4 CPO companies: http://www.thanetgazette.co.uk/Questions-new-Manston-partners/story-28248263-detail/story.html

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. just have to wait until February Anon

      Delete
  23. Wells and UKIP are in a catch 22!so are Riveroak&Co;Humpty Dumpty is on them!The game was afoot from the day Humpty met Gale.:3698:

    ReplyDelete