Saturday, 28 November 2015

RO put their foot in it

Remember these?
They're images from Niall Lawlor's interview which was posted on both SMA and SuMA, much to the delight of the supporters . And the reason they  got so excited by it? Well they particularly seemed to enjoy the fact that Lawlor publically attacked the owners of Stone Hill Park. Especially where Lawlor made unfounded allegations about Cartner & Musgrave's business acumen


Anyway, that same video is no longer available.
It's not on YouTube. It's not on SMA. And it's not on SuMA.
A Google search doesn't locate it. It's gone. Completely.
Wonder why?
Well wonder no more
 Seems someone overstepped the bounds of decency and landed themselves in hot water. TDC also have got the message that Riveroak have no morals and have simply gone too far this time.

33 comments:

  1. Hello Barry,l woz wondering how long it would take Riveroak to be on warning,legally speaking,Freudmann has come a cropper with some back in the US,lots of finger pointing mostly at Freudmann &Co,River no Oak trees are asking people to help sort this mess,they've now found that there on their own! Only Freudmann &Co can help,but it's Winter in the UK and guess whos got cold feet?,there's eight feet and not a leg to stand on.No option now but to go for it,legally speaking.No problema Humpty Dumptys waiting in the winds.

    ReplyDelete
  2. A bridge to far,and no bridging loans on this one old chap,said the banker to the GANG!¡.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Being someone who wears glasses,is it me or are Mr Lawlor's bins fake,like the business plain,just plain See through lol.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Oh yea,specs,pinstripe suit,winsor knot tie,I suspect some brogdes and last but not least a poppy,nearly a English Gent,better hang on to that nicker,it's about all the british property he'll have in his Hands.Oh and egg on his boat race.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Typical estate agent...

      Delete
    2. Yea Bang On,12:31

      Delete
  5. Gazette foi says no 4 mystery investors. Is Wells just BSing us for as long as possible. Vote of no confidence. ..

    ReplyDelete
  6. When is the Vince Munday TDC election? Is it true there was no RTC election in May?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Soon anon however I doubt many will bother looking at the calibre of candidates. and No to your second comment

      Delete
    2. Duncan Smithson seems a ukip dynamo. Who is he? Is he standing for Rtc too?

      Delete
    3. Supposedly in January for Tdc but nothing confirmed or the Rtc election

      Delete
    4. 21st January apparently but a strange requirement to register by Friday? ! Is that correct two days notice of an election? Or just tdc fraud? No mention of Rtc

      Delete
  7. Whatever happened to Mackinlay and his MP manifesto? He hasn't said anything since May...We should have Recall if it was all a bit of hot air

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Mackinlay is urging war today but worried we will run out of both missiles and money. Errr wouldn't we just make some more?

      Delete
  8. Mackinlay is looking like a wee accountant out of his depth already

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cword Mackinlay is The Fighting Accountant now! You bomb 'em from Chatham or Ramsgate or wherever you are! Manston as an RAF base again?!

      Delete
  9. Wells is moaning about tdc debt but knew that before the election. And was part of it as Tory hesd of manston. Instead of moaning or cutting services why nit sack civil servants or cut pensions? Weve paid too much for failure

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Who is we? keyboard warriors who haven't any courage!!!

      Delete
    2. We as in the taxpayer or public. Its grammatical Bazza

      Delete
    3. yup posting as anon is typical Keyboard warrior skills

      Delete
    4. zzzz you need more of a comeback than keyboard warrior for posts Baz: all the blogposts here are anon except for Humpty Dumpty

      Delete
    5. What would you like? idiots? Cowards? hypocrites? they all fit. Put a name to the post it helps when identifying a conversation

      Delete
    6. Barry people do have conversations here on your site,yes mostly Anon,maybe because of a back lash from 'We want an Airport Mob",U can C that,Yes?for what it's worth,I for one apreciaré your site and time.And so i would think do all the Anons who comment here,Humpty Dumpty would understand and agree with that one!

      Delete
    7. So that's ok Anon my name goes on my comments so I can have the entire backlash? and how does one identify a backlash when no one puts their name to anything. Its like getting stung by a butterfly

      Delete
    8. No it's not ok it just is what it is,other sites have no anonymous options so people shy away.Your blog gives people a voice,be it a nameless one.

      Delete
  10. Your blog has just been given a plug on one of the pro sites so you may get some more activity with a bit of luck. Good to get acknowledgement.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I doubt what you say is right anon however if you are correct all the cowards on there are bottling having a conversation on here. As you can see no one uses their real name except me because they don't have the courage to use their own name. True keyboard warriors

      Delete
    2. Come away Baz they're not worth it. But accusing every anon of being a keyboard warrior hardly creates debate on the issues raised. ..

      Delete
    3. of course it does they and you can only post as anon as it takes courage to look over the parapet

      Delete
  11. I have posted to you using my own name but you didn't print it, so I don't know if you got it or not. ( It was about Robert Bird's letter. My name is Marva Rees.) I'm going to send this using the Anonymous profile to make sure you get it. Considering how unpleasant some pro-airport posters are, it's not surprising that some people don't want to use their names.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You can either create a google account to post or use name/url to post a real name

      Delete
    2. That's true Marva,what letter from Bird?please tell again,
      Regards Humpty Dumpty.

      Delete